.

Sunday, March 3, 2019

Cultural Anthropology Comparison Essay Essay

deuce authors published separate articles that discussed the effects of Technology on families and on golf club in general. These articles are Technology and Social Change The Effects on Family and Community, write by Jan English-Lueck in 1998 and Communication technologies that will change our lives, written by Graham T. T. Monitor in 2003. However, firearm both authors discussed the homogeneous topic, which is how technology gener wholey affects the lives of people, they differ in the areas that they foc economic consumptiond on in their respective articles.Basically, English-Lueck, in his article, claimed that technology has not actually adversely abnormal the way family members communicate among apiece separate, but has kinda enhanced it. harmonise to him, the most significant and most obvious impact of technology on a family is that a persons bring ining hours extend to his or her work home. In other words, a due to the massive enhancement of technology, a person brin gs his or her work home when he or she should be allocating that time for his or her family.Based on English-Luecks article, while this can initially be viewed as a negative impact, the circumstance is, technology has actually efficiently improved the way family members communicate among all(prenominal) other. For example, a family camping trip can easily be plan in a single afternoon through the use of a pager or an E-mail as compared to the conventional method of grooming it over dinner. Moreover, according to the article, family members who spend most of their time at work can regularly check if their children by paging them or label them using a cellphone.In addition, a person can suffice to emergency duties at work through by using a fax machine. In other words, English-Lueck in his article claims that it is wrong to prehend that products of technology has negatively affected the family life since it they have actually do communication between members more convenient and more constant. On the other hand, Graham T. T. Monitors article focused on how fast technology has been increasing over the past years and how this has lead to suspension down barriers in communication.Basically, Monitor said that due to constant scientific advancements, which he believes will soon match the speed and power of the kind brain, the society and families, both young and old, can easily access all types of digital communication devices that can enable them to communicate among themselves anywhere and anytime. check to him, this is possibly the most important effect on the family because it bridges the hold between family members or kin that are far away from each other. In other words, Monitor claims that the technology is improving so cursorily that people would never have to worry about communication problems.In short, both authors claim that while technological advancements can initially appear overwhelming, it should not adversely affect the way families live their lives but rather improve it. According to them, as technology improves, families should adapt to these new changes and use them to their advantage. Furthermore, both English-Lueck and Montior agreed in principle that these technological enhancements make work, family management, and, most of all, communication more efficient and that these technological trends will continue in the future.

No comments:

Post a Comment