Is new technology a need with a higher expense or a want in simplicity Research Paper

Is revolutionary technology a need with a higher expense or a want in simplicity in aviation - look into Paper ExampleGlobal passenger traffic has risen from about 1.7 billion in the yr 2000 to about 3 billion in 2012 with only two dips in the tr ratiocination happening in the year 2011 due to the 9/11 attack, economic downturn, and the SARS Epidemic, and also in the year 2010 caused by the financial crises and global recession (International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and International Air Transport necktie (IATA) (as cited in Beynon). The reasonable response of airline companies with the greater influx of passengers is to add new planes to its fleet. A proclaim by the Airline Monitor (2012) compiled the total air craft deliveries per year by Boeing and Airbus, two of the largest aircraft shaper (as cited in Beynon). The report shows that there will be a total of 1,300 new aircrafts delivered by the end of 2013 and as much as 1,600 additional aircrafts by 2019. The co st of procuring an A350 (Airbus) is about $320 million while a B777 (Boeing) costs about $315 million. (Rothman and Walid and AircraftCompare.com) It is evident from these statistics that a huge chunk of the tax payers money are channeled to the approach of aircrafts used by our armed forces and theres also a lot of money cosmos poured out into the commercial airline business. However, we are retributive recovering from the effects of the Global recession and the financial crises thats why we need to take in perspective the amount of money that we spend as well as the government spends on buying and improving our aircrafts. Two of the changes that aircraft manufacturers infuse in their new fleets are better fuel efficiency and replacement of gauges in the cockpit with Multifunction Electronic Display Systems (MEDS). The MEDS are essentially cathode-ray tube (CRT), active-matrix liquid-crystal display (AMLCD) (tannas.com) or LED monitors that display the information once seen fro m the different gauges in the cockpit. interrupt fuel consumption is highly beneficial for cost reduction and lessening the impact of flight to the milieu however, there is a question on why we need to upgrade the gauges to panels and monitors when the mechanical gauges works yet fine? Is this upgrade a necessity that we are willing to pay high prices for or just a whim to make things simpler in aviation? I. The Need for Electronic Flight Displays The glass cockpit as NASA names it is a new configuration in the airplane and space shuttle cockpit design victimisation CRT, LCD, or LED screens in place of the old electromechanical displays, gauges and instruments that have worked for so long in the aviation industry. Instead of having multiple knobs, buttons, switches, indicators, gauges and symbols that cluttered the cockpit, the screens now display all the relevant information for the cowcatcher to safely take-off, fly and land the plane (NASA, 2000). Lane Wallace, a corresponde nt of the Airborn Trailblazer said that beforehand the 70s there really was no need for computerized electronic flight displays however, with the increasing complexity of aircrafts, the improvement of digital systems and ballooning air traffic prompted the need for displays that could process raw in-flight and aircraft-systems data and integrate is so as the displayed information contains the position, situation and progress of the aircraft within the three dimensions and with regards to speed and time. (NASA) The developers of this technology say that cockpits that are fitted with these displays