Divorce or Annulment Essay -- Social Issues, Custody of the Children

In the failure of marriage, most couples nowadays elect to withstand a divorce or annulment. For them, separation is a herd easier than forcing a relationship to work. However, the consequences of divorce appear to have greater impacts on children and not just on the couple. The custody of the children is usually brought into court settlements to check off which party, whether the mothers or the fathers, qualifies for custody. In this regard, lawyers require military service from mental health brights who would make evaluations of both parties. Mental health technicals similarly render counseling that would help the indivithreefolds to cope with the condition that they are experiencing. This way, the psychologist would have two-fold tasks a forensic evaluator and a therapeutic counselor. This dual task would be the center of this discussion.In 1997, Greenberg and Shuman wrote an article that shows the irreconcilable affair mingled with dual roles of mental health experts in court proceedings. some(prenominal) factors have enabled mental health experts to appear as forensic expert witnesses. However, these two roles are not compatible due to several differences amidst these and confidentiality and anonymity are compromised.Definitions must first be provided to differentiate between the roles. The healer refers to a clinician or mental health expert who provides psychotherapy to the client. His primary responsibility is to treat his patient. A fact witness, meanwhile, refers to the person testifying ground on direct observations. He does not offer expert opinions. In short, a therapist who serves as fact witness is someone who testifies establish on the observations carried out during therapy. His conclusions are thus drawn from his observations (Strasburger, Gutheil, &... ...ings as therapist and forensic expert. This is due to the premise that assuming the roles of both a therapist and a forensic expert may lead to the possibility that the expe rt is more concerned about the conclusion of the case than the integrity and accuracy of his testimony. Furthermore, there are many differences between the roles of the therapist and the expert. Some of these differences acknowledge attitudes of each expert, goals, and roles of therapist-patient and forensic-expert-patient relationships. These differences lead to the incompatibility of dual roles. Furthermore, confidentiality and anonymity are compromised when therapists provide testimony in court proceedings. While some researchers believe that the dual roles can be compatible, the points discussed in this paper are adequate copious to conclude that therapeutic and forensic roles are incompatible.