A Comparison of Socrates’ and Luther’s Ideas of Freedom

contempt a difference of around deuce millennia, or 2000 years, the claims to emancipation of the Greek philosopher Socrates and the German Leader of the Protestant Reformation Martin Luther loan themselves to twain similarities and differences.Although t here are to a greater extent differences than similarities, the both workings select both not only expressed the dreams and aspirations of these two great man that especially changed the societies in which they lived, although gradually.This paper forget handle the similarities between Socrates claims in the excuse and those of Luther in Concerning Christian Liberty. This paper will question the similarities between Socrates claims to exemption in the Apology and those of Luther in Concerning Christian Liberty.SimilaritiesThe claims of Socrates and Luther to certain libertys contend a few similarities.An Exhortation to compensate Established Institutions. Both Socrates and Luthers claims for exemption exhorted people t o oppose established institutions. small-arm Socrates tried to undermine the immoral shipway of Athenian society, Luther wanted to expose the defects in the theological bases of the doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church.Socrates, on unrivalled hand, criticized Athenian society when he said, If there were a law of nature at Athens, such as there is in an otherwise(prenominal) cities, that a capital build should not be decided in one day, then I swear that I should hasten convinced you (Apology).And in some way he implied a certain bond of Athenians to gold when he said, I break up you that virtue is not given by money, but that from virtue come money and every other good of man, usual as well as private. (Apology)On the other hand, Luther exhorted Christians and Catholics to question the theological basis of the Catholic doctrines. He expressed his opposition when he mentioned every time he mentioned that works were not a path to spiritual salvation but only opinion an d faith alone. Aside from this, he mentioned thatit will profit nothing that the body should be adorned with sacred vestments, or live on in holy places, or be occupied in sacred offices, or pray, fast, and abstain from certain meats, or do whatever works can be done through the body and in the body. (Luther)DifferencesThe claims of Socrates and Luther to certain licenses also lend themselves to a number of differences from the notion of their libertys to the way they energise presented their claims.Notion of Freedom. Socrates and Luther were both fighting for different kinds of freedoms.First of all, one of the freedoms that Socrates was fighting for was more(prenominal) of a freedom of expression, or specifically a habitual freedom to question the logic that operated back the Athenian justice system. The Athenian Meletus criminate Socrates of being a doer of evil, and corrupter of the youth, and he does not believe in the gods of the sound out, and has other new divinitie s of his own (Apology).To this accusation, Socrates sarcastically claims his freedom of expression by saying, If my offence is unintentional, the law has no cognizance of unintentional offences you ought to have interpreted me privately, and warned and admonished me (Apology). This is the more personal freedom that Socrates was fighting for in the course of his defending team. Socrates turn up Meletus illogic several times during his defense so Socrates was indirectly making here a claim for the freedom of the mastermind through logic.As for the other freedom that Socrates seemed to have been fighting for was the freedom of philosophy. This freedom was implied when Socrates said, workforce of Athens, I honor and love you but I shall obey God earlier than you, and while I have sprightliness and strength I shall never hold back from the practice and teaching of philosophy (Apology). much(prenominal) a statement was naturally taken by the Athenian court as a defiance of the auth ority of the state that defined obedience to God as obedience to the laws rather than to ones philosophy.Furthermore, Socrates claim for this freedom and his defense of it in Platos Apology was more of a defense of personal convictions considering that Socrates himself was on campaign at the time that he state his claims for this freedom.Based on the aforementioned points, the idea of freedom of Socrates was different from that proposed by Luther. Luthers ideas were more on religion rather than on logic and philosophy. Luther expressed the nature of the freedom that he claims when he said, For faith alone, and the in force(p) use of the leger of God, brings salvation (Luther). This thusly is a freedom from works, and is explicitly stated by Luther when he said, this faith cannot rest at all with works(Luther) and that no work can cleave to the word of God (Luther).